Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)

From: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Date: 2017-03-22 14:20:44
Message-ID: CAD__OujLNd_+aRSCzU_n0kRx6A4ahcwQhjqJxvctGt4NUMo6wA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Sorry, I did not mean to suggest that you set it up wrongly, I was just
> trying to point out that the test case itself may not be very practical.
That is cool np!, I was just trying to explain why those tests were
made if others wondered about it.

--
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-03-22 14:20:50 pgsql: Sync pg_dump and pg_dumpall output
Previous Message João Miguel Afonso 2017-03-22 14:16:55 Re: [GSoC] Personal presentation and request for clarification