Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.

From: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Date: 2017-01-24 16:55:24
Message-ID: CAD__OuiVJTUzaF0=zs1EQ3dsgT01ONkW2FkMMQpj26i5xk_Exw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> I welcome this feature! I remember pg_hibernate did this. I wonder what happened to pg_hibernate. Did you check it?
Thanks, when I checked with pg_hibernate there were two things people
complained about it. Buffer loading will start after the recovery is
finished and the database has reached the consistent state. Two It can
replace existing buffers which are loaded due to recovery and newly
connected clients. And this solution tried to solve them.

--
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Verite 2017-01-24 16:59:10 Re: Improvements in psql hooks for variables
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2017-01-24 16:54:09 Re: Improvements in psql hooks for variables