Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbench read-write tests.

From: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbench read-write tests.
Date: 2018-07-20 03:03:02
Message-ID: CAD__Ouhs4cSiBcQTxYdqQzHF94wQhi0HdjksXSHbeQ=F0ZSt4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Andres,

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 1:21 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 2018-01-24 00:06:44 +0530, Mithun Cy wrote:
> > Server:
> > ./postgres -c shared_buffers=8GB -N 200 -c min_wal_size=15GB -c
> > max_wal_size=20GB -c checkpoint_timeout=900 -c
> > maintenance_work_mem=1GB -c checkpoint_completion_target=0.9 &
>
> Which kernel & glibc version does this server have?
>

[mithun(dot)cy(at)cthulhu ~]$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.10.0-693.5.2.el7.x86_64 (builder(at)kbuilder(dot)dev(dot)centos(dot)org)
(gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-16) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Fri Oct 20
20:32:50 UTC 2017

[mithun(dot)cy(at)cthulhu ~]$ ldd --version
ldd (GNU libc) 2.17

--
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-07-20 04:15:07 Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbench read-write tests.
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-07-20 02:27:11 Re: partition tree inspection functions