Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbench read-write tests.

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbench read-write tests.
Date: 2018-07-19 19:51:01
Message-ID: 20180719195101.l7zvullsgkq5qvrf@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-01-24 00:06:44 +0530, Mithun Cy wrote:
> Server:
> ./postgres -c shared_buffers=8GB -N 200 -c min_wal_size=15GB -c
> max_wal_size=20GB -c checkpoint_timeout=900 -c
> maintenance_work_mem=1GB -c checkpoint_completion_target=0.9 &

Which kernel & glibc version does this server have?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-07-19 19:54:40 Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbench read-write tests.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-07-19 19:49:35 Re: [HACKERS] possible self-deadlock window after bad ProcessStartupPacket