| From: | Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter van Hardenberg <pvh(at)pvh(dot)ca>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Date: | 2016-11-10 14:59:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAD__OuhrU8BoaJ7-AtK_8+psCx_OhPnGw-+R8dVhHimrvneF+A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <
tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> Why don't you add "standby" and "prefer_standby" as the
target_server_type value? Are you thinking that those values are useful
with load balancing > feature?
Yes this patch will only address failover to new master, values "master"
and "any" appeared sufficient for that case.
--
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kuntal Ghosh | 2016-11-10 15:02:58 | Re: WAL consistency check facility |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-11-10 14:45:32 | Re: Copying Permissions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2016-11-11 06:25:13 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Previous Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2016-11-10 07:41:00 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |