From: | Vignesh Raghunathan <vignesh(dot)pgsql(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Parsing tuple contents |
Date: | 2015-08-13 04:27:58 |
Message-ID: | CAD_AmVjK8iqJf_3Pr-4S0F=tvxbofwrxm8MNAZUW-EKbEc-Mpw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you very much for the response.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Vignesh Raghunathan <vignesh(dot)pgsql(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I am working on a project which requires going through each field inside
> a
> > tuple without using postgresql. I have managed to iterate through each
> > tuple inside a table by recycling postgres's code. However, for the part
> of
> > parsing through each field in the tuple, I am not able to think of
> anything
> > other than using a bunch of if/else or switch case statements to handle
> > each postgresql datatype. I looked through postgresql's code base but I
> am
> > unable to identify the part of code that might do this. Could anyone
> please
> > let me know where to look?
>
> Well, as far as identifying the field boundaries is concerned, there are
> not that many cases: you basically only need to worry about typlen and
> typalign. heap_deform_tuple() would be a good model.
>
> Of course, if you want to print the values in some human-readable form,
> there is not going to be a good substitute for per-datatype code :-(
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2015-08-13 06:19:23 | Re: Test code is worth the space |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2015-08-13 03:28:09 | Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL |