| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Felix Lechner <felix(dot)lechner(at)lease-up(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support |
| Date: | 2020-06-27 19:35:20 |
| Message-ID: | CADUqk8XWkurQ64+Hi2eMQix3-YqYpL=AJ70BhH6zB0=6xG5F9w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:25 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 09:50, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
> escreveu:
>
>> Re: Peter Eisentraut
>> > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
>>
>> Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
>>
> I'm curious, how do you intend to solve a linking problem with
> OpenSSL-vs-GPL-readline, with another GPL product?
> WolfSSL, will provide a commercial license for PostgreSQL?
> Isn't LIbreSSL a better alternative?
>
Somewhere, I recall seeing an open-source OpenSSL compatibility wrapper for
WolfSSL. Assuming that still exists, this patch seems entirely unnecessary.
--
Jonah H. Harris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2020-06-27 19:37:42 | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support |
| Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-06-27 19:22:51 | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support |