Re: Allow ssl_renegotiation_limit in PG 9.5

From: Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <Pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allow ssl_renegotiation_limit in PG 9.5
Date: 2015-10-24 07:14:54
Message-ID: CADT4RqA_zwW_O6k17JEynb4a85ZPjAedMhwa0XysT021rF5POA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> > Here's a patch that adds back the GUC, with default/min/max 0 and
> > GUC_NO_SHOW_ALL | GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE | GUC_DISALLOW_IN_FILE.
> >
> > This is my first pg patch, please be gentle with any screwups :)
>
> Why, you dummy.
>
> No, actually, this looks fine. I've committed it and back-patched it
> to 9.5. I took the liberty of making some cosmetic changes, however.
>
> Thanks for preparing this patch.
>

Thanks for accepting it! It will definitely save some trouble.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2015-10-24 08:54:16 Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Previous Message Victor Wagner 2015-10-24 06:38:12 Re: Patch (2): Implement failover on libpq connect level.