Re: send/receive buffer size

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Scott Harrington <scotth01(at)sns-usa(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: send/receive buffer size
Date: 2012-09-12 11:33:33
Message-ID: CADK3HHLfsxWwOyZE06f8DguFeoA538vvsSf5Z4vw2UbqCH0SbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Scott,

There is a build.local.properties, or build.xml where you can set
values. Agreed it may be difficult to test.

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Scott Harrington <scotth01(at)sns-usa(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Dave, I understand completely - I will "enrich" the LocalAddress patch at
> least with documentation, but as for a test case, I am not sure we can pick
> an appropriate value for the localAddress (possibly "127.0.0.1" ?) that
> would work reliably in different environments. Suggestions?
>
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> Scott,
>>
>> As you can see the code patch is one thing. I also have to add
>> documentation, and test cases. It would be much easier if those
>> things were also included in the patch.
>>
>>
>> Dave Cramer
>>
>> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
>> http://www.credativ.ca
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Scott Harrington <scotth(at)sns-usa(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you Dave, will you consider the localAddress patch also?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've applied this patch with changes to use camelCase for
>>>> sendBufferSize, and receiveBufferSize to 9.2
>>>> Originally supplied by Bernd Helme
>>>>
>>>> Dave Cramer
>>>>
>>>> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
>>>> http://www.credativ.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Scott Harrington <scotth01(at)sns-usa(dot)com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Shijun Kong wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I read a thread somewhere that somebody contributed a patch for adding
>>>>>> support of configurable send/receive buffer size. Did it ever commit
>>>>>> into
>>>>>> master branch? I did not see any commit message about this change for
>>>>>> last
>>>>>> 12 months.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I wondered the same last weekend and found that the patch had NOT yet
>>>>> found
>>>>> its way into pgjdbc on github. In case it helps you, I've attached that
>>>>> old
>>>>> patch in a form that should apply cleanly against the latest sources
>>>>> (unless
>>>>> something's changed in the last 10 days).
>>>>>
>>>>> Before merging, maintainers would probably want to rename the property
>>>>> names
>>>>> (which have underscores in this patch) to better conform to the other
>>>>> driver
>>>>> properties which use camelcaps for the most part.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have also attached a "localAddress" patch that I find useful (I think
>>>>> I
>>>>> posted it myself a while ago, but in any case here's an updated patch
>>>>> that
>>>>> should apply more cleanly against recent sources).
>>>>>
>>>>> -Scott
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florent Guillaume 2012-09-12 13:35:39 Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal
Previous Message Scott Harrington 2012-09-12 11:24:35 Re: send/receive buffer size