Re: postgresql-jdbc driver not respecting prepareThreshold=0

On 3 February 2017 at 09:52, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 3 February 2017 at 09:16, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for not looking this up myself, but have you provided an updated
>>>> documentation patch then ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Well, apart ​from the connection parameter in
>>> https://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/head/connect.html there is no
>>> section about logging, let me send a patch for that with the new connection
>>> properties (there are already updated in the README.md).
>>>
>>> BTW, I think that the documentation (and the website in general) is
>>> getting outdated, after the release maybe someone focus on a fresh site.
>>>
>>> Maybe this have been asked before, but, is not better to have the
>>> documentation along with the driver? maybe use the standard /docs folder so
>>> it's easier to use GitHub Pages.
>>>
>>
>> The patch would have to be against the www site.
>>
>> I'm not in favour of moving it to github. It is owned by the postgresql
>> group, and should remain there.
>>
>
>
> Maybe I express me bad, ​I'm not saying to move the hosting to GitHub, I
> mean to move the *www/documentation/head* into *pgjdbc/docs*. that
> probably would require a 2 step generation and publish of the documentation
> (I'm not aware of the current process of the update to jdbc.postgresql.org)
> but it will simplify a lot making a single PR with a change and update to
> documentation, and "additionally" contributors can enable GitHub pages for
> their forks to see real changes made to docs.
>
>
>
The current process is manual, I have to do it, as I am the only one who
has access to the machine that hosts jdbc.postgresql.org

I'm in favour of moving it.

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com