| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status) |
| Date: | 2019-07-11 19:15:55 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHLNZbGfR=-1vMJ9ri9RA+T7Vgyn0+8XG5PsK9itHEK9BQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 15:07, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:29 PM Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> > So if I understand this correctly if user bob has altered his search
> path and there is a security-definer function called owned by him then
> > the search path will be changed for the duration of the function and
> reported for every iteration? The implications of this are "interesting" to
> say the least.
>
> I don't believe that it matters what search path has been set using
> ALTER USER bob.
Why wouldn't it ???
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2019-07-11 19:34:25 | Re: initdb recommendations |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-07-11 19:07:20 | Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process |