Re: Regarding useObjects

From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks>
To: Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>
Cc: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regarding useObjects
Date: 2023-09-27 10:17:37
Message-ID: CADK3HHL7JGKre6r0xVTqAQg5Em1zC5McMrgr0v6Dudzfb0DybQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 06:07, Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <
a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:

>
> On 9/27/23 12:55, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
>
> > So the problem with using float instead of Float is that it is
> impossible to have a null float and arrays can have nulls.
>
> There's a feature request for retrieving primitive arrays:
> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/2939
>
> back in pre-postgresql-42* days we used to use -888 and -888.888 to
> represent int NULL and float NULL respectively, quite ...primitive but it
> worked. We should retain this old mapping , but once all systems are up to
> date we will start storing and reading NULLs in arrays as NULLs.
>
Using that mapping is not something that we would entertain.

If you are going to actually store NULL in the array, how would that work
with primitives ?

Dave

>
> Vladimir
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleas Mantzios - cloud 2023-09-27 10:28:42 Re: Regarding useObjects
Previous Message Achilleas Mantzios - cloud 2023-09-27 10:07:39 Re: Regarding useObjects