On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 10:50, Glen Huang <heyhgl(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> From application’s standpoint, it seems using CTE saves a lot work. You no
> longer need to parse values out only to pass them back in, and only one
> round-trip to the db server.
>
> If I’m not wrong, CTE is equivalent to serializable transactions? So I
> guess the downsize is that quarries can’t be run in parallel?
>
I do not think a CTE changes the isolation level.
>
> If I decide to replace all my transaction code with CTE, will I shoot
> myself in the foot down the road?
>
Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks