From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "rprice314(at)yahoo(dot)com" <rprice314(at)yahoo(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Spring Transactional Support |
Date: | 2017-10-12 11:32:54 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHL32pYN2KBwc3G_gJyd=Rg5JKboPHq1a9R3A3Uqc_3b-Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Well I don't think the driver itself has any issue with this, nor does it
care about the annotation. This is all hibernate AFAIK ?
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
On 11 October 2017 at 23:39, Robert Price <rprice314(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah I was thinking of using the @transactional annotation to do
> transactions in postgres and wanted to verify that postgres supported this
> annotation. Use case would be to set session variables and then use a table
> filter that referenced the session variables. Requires multiple queries to
> be run in the same session/transaction
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Dave Cramer
> <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Care to elaborate on the question ?
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
> www.postgresintl.com
>
> On 10 October 2017 at 20:36, Robert Price <rprice314(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Seeing conflicting information and wanted to confirm that the
> transactional annotation was supported by sping jdbc. Also wanted to see if
> anyone had attempted to set session variables in postgres before executing
> a query.
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2017-10-12 14:57:59 | Re: Spring Transactional Support |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2017-10-11 16:35:04 | Re: Spring Transactional Support |