Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly

From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly
Date: 2021-07-30 10:48:34
Message-ID: CADK3HHKz4ruqmqiph2cLvg53AibAPsEyen4uDXe1h5bu-nwWjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 at 06:39, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 06:03:50AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> > What would happen if subsequent to the upgrade "ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE"
> > was executed ?
>
> If the extension was already up to date on the source cluster then
> obviously
> nothing.
>
> Otherwise, the extension would be updated. But unless I'm willing (and
> remember) to copy/paste until the end of time an anonymous block code that
> checks the current server version to see if the wrapper function needs to
> be
> overwritten then nothing will happen either as far as this function is
> concerned.
>

Well I think that's on the extension author to fix. There's only so much
pg_upgrade can do here.
It seems reasonable that upgrading the extension should upgrade the
extension to the latest version.

Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lætitia Avrot 2021-07-30 10:55:42 Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-07-30 10:39:45 Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly