Re: Correct documentation for protocol version

From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Correct documentation for protocol version
Date: 2025-06-27 11:20:38
Message-ID: CADK3HHKuwXS3AeRXemJUyg_ByV8GQJvf1ck4WAOD-2XG5qwm+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 18:04, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:

> On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 11:00, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
> wrote:
> > If we decide to keep it I think it would be best to have all protocol
> > changes on a single page. I'd just put the changes from 2.0 to 3.0 at
> > the bottom of the page.
>
> Attached are my proposed changes which split this page into different
> sections, one for each protocol version, with the most recent protocol
> changes at the top.
>

Thanks Jelte,

Looks good to me

Dave Cramer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2025-06-27 11:34:35 vacuumlazy: Modernize count_nondeletable_pages
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2025-06-27 11:02:22 Re: [PATCH] Add tests for binaryheap.c