Re: GIT move

Did this happen ?

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
<andreak(at)officenet(dot)no> wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 08:38 AM, Kris Jurka wrote:
>>
>> So we've discussed a move to git for some time and are just about ready to
>> do that based on Maciek's work.  So in conjunction with that, I think we
>> should move off of pgfoundry at the same time.  pgfoundry is bound to be
>> shutdown soon and we shouldn't stick with it to the end like we did with
>> gborg.  So instead of moving to the disorganized git.postgresql.org which
>> only offers git hosting, I'd suggest we move to github which will give us
>> more exposure and additional hosting features like a wiki and issue
>> tracking.
>>
>> Since we don't have any major work in progress I see no need to hold up
>> this move.  Does anyone have an objection to moving things over the
>> weekend of 2/4?
>>
>> The only thing that pgfoundry still supports is the jdbc-commits mailing
>> list.  So we could send that mail to the general pgjdbc list or we could
>> not bother sending it anywhere and let people pick it up via the
>> methods provided by github or perhaps we could petition the postgresql.org
>> infrastructure for another list.
>>
>> Kris Jurka
>
>
> +1
>
> --
> Andreas Joseph Krogh<andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>  - mob: +47 909 56 963
> Senior Software Developer / CTO - OfficeNet AS - http://www.officenet.no
> Public key: http://home.officenet.no/~andreak/public_key.asc
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc