| From: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column |
| Date: | 2021-10-15 13:39:36 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHKKQ4H06yj86iPq_S8uEqk8MbW15m7OYusnr-CO7tyzig@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 09:29, Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com> wrote:
> Le 15/10/2021 à 14:24, Aleksander Alekseev a écrit :
> > Hi Gilles,
> >
> >> If we really want SELECT * to be reserved to DBA then why not removing
> the
> >> star from PG unless you have the admin privilege?
> > Respectfully, I perceive this as a trolling (presumably, non-intentional
> one)
> > and not going to answer this.
>
>
> Yes, I don't wanted to offend you or to troll. This was just to point
> that the position of "SELECT * is bad practice" is not a good argument
> in my point of view, just because it is allowed for every one. I mean
> that in an extension or a client which allow user query input we must
> handle the case.
>
>
This would break an awful lot of apps.
Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-10-15 13:46:18 | Re: installcheck fails when compute_query_id=on or pg_stat_statsement is loaded |
| Previous Message | Gilles Darold | 2021-10-15 13:29:13 | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column |