Re: Re: [SQL] JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this?

Craig,

That is the current implementation. What do you suggest as a more
robust implementation ?

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 07:29 PM, Radosław Smogura wrote:
>>
>> Long, long time ago I've sent implementation with timers, you need to
>> search archive If you need this.
>
>
> If it was ages ago, you probably used java.util.Timer, right?
>
> java.util.Timer is not suitable for use in a JDBC driver because it doesn't
> do any exception handling on the timer thread, it's subject to congestion on
> the timer thread, and it offers no way for the driver to control the timer
> thread to cleanly shut it down during unload. It's unusable in app servers
> and not really a great idea anywhere that needs to be robust and
> long-running.
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc