From: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Anthony Roberts <anthony(dot)roberts(at)linaro(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mike Holmes <mike(dot)holmes(at)linaro(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Lina Iyer <lina(dot)iyer(at)linaro(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support |
Date: | 2024-01-26 14:18:50 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHJgTqi7ZeKhBvegTk1=rzDYfGgEJqZN-hNMvQPAJ6R3PA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 07:36, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On 2024-01-25 Th 20:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:52:30PM -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 16:32, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
> wrote:
> >>> On 2024-01-25 Th 16:17, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >>> Yeah, I think the default Developer Command Prompt for VS2022 is set up
> >>> for x86 builds. AIUI you should start by executing "vcvarsall
> x64_arm64".
> >> Yup, now I'm in the same state you are
> > Wait a minute here. Based on [1], x64_arm64 means you can use a x64
> > host and you'll be able to produce ARM64 builds, still these will not
> > be able to run on the host where they were built. How much of the
> > patch posted upthread is required to produce such builds? Basically
> > everything from it, I guess, so as build dependencies can be
> > satisfied?
> >
> > [1]:
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/building-on-the-command-line?view=msvc-170
>
>
> If you look at the table here x86 and x64 are the only supported host
> architectures. But that's OK, the x64 binaries will run on arm64 (W11
> ARM64 has x64 emulation builtin). If that didn't work Dave and I would
> not have got as far as we have. But you want the x64_arm64 argument to
> vcvarsall so you will get ARM64 output.
>
I've rebuilt it using x64_arm64 and with the attached (very naive patch)
and I still get an x64 binary :(
>
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
lock.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2024-01-26 14:37:42 | Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-01-26 14:05:54 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |