Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)

9.3.1201 which was still built using ant

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com

On 7 January 2016 at 13:53, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thursday 07 of January 2016 13:35:13 Dave Cramer wrote:
> > When was the driver last upgraded ?
> >
> > debian has 1201 which was built with ant.
>
> 9.3-1201 or 9.4.1201? Fedora has 9.4-1200, per [1]. I would be
> interested how Debian solved the packaging issues.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196445
>
> Pavel
>
> > Dave Cramer
> >
> > davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
> > www.postgresintl.com
> >
> > On 7 January 2016 at 12:24, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday 07 of January 2016 12:10:04 Dave Cramer wrote:
> > > > Before this change we used ant, plus a number of plugins. Which would
> > > have
> > > > had to have been built from source. Is this somehow different ?
> > > >
> > > > Dave Cramer
> > > > davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
> > >
> > > This problem existed before (with ant) too. Due to that, we haven't
> > > updated postgresql-jdbc package very-very long ago, so haven't Debian
> > > AFAIK.
> > >
> > > I don't complain! :) Your work is very appreciated. But
> unfortunately, we
> > > are not able to distribute your software ATM and we are trying to
> change
> > > that.
> > >
> > > Pavel
> > >
> > >
>
>