From: | Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Btrfs clone WIP patch |
Date: | 2013-02-13 23:04:01 |
Message-ID: | CADAkt-iiP4KCQNOGO7hFS1cLMwDkxddB9Xn2sErKZz516RqgMQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 02/13/2013 02:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The big-picture question of course is whether we want to carry and
>> maintain a filesystem-specific hack. I don't have a sense that btrfs
>> is so widely used as to justify this.
>
> If this is a valuable hack, it seems like it could work on ZFS as well.
> If we could make it for any snapshot-capable filesystem, and not just
> BTRFS, then it would make more sense.
I was thinking that too, but I think this is a file level clone, not a
whole filesystem. As far as I can tell, you can't clone individual
files in ZFS.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
> http://pgexperts.com
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-13 23:26:14 | Re: Btrfs clone WIP patch |
Previous Message | Jonathan Rogers | 2013-02-13 23:00:42 | Re: Btrfs clone WIP patch |