| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Using LibPq in TAP tests via FFI |
| Date: | 2024-06-16 14:59:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAD5tBcJAz4EGMLi+uJcJ7pZtT0vwJ_=uU_ATJn39x9GFePW6ZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 7:42 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 3:33 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I haven't reviewed the patch, but a big +1 for the idea. Not only this
> > might cut down on the resource costs of running the tests in CI, as
>
> It would be good to keep some context between the threads here. For
> the archives' sake, here is where the potential savings were reported,
> and this and other ideas were discussed:
>
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKGJoEO33K%3DZynsH%3DxkiEyfBMZjOoqBK%2BgouBdTGW2-woig%40mail.gmail.com
Yeah thanks for adding that context.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-06-16 15:10:39 | Re: proposal: plpgsql, new check for extra_errors - strict_expr_check |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2024-06-16 14:58:33 | Re: Using LibPq in TAP tests via FFI |