From: | vijay patil <vijay(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Request for Feedback on PostgreSQL HA + Load Balancing Architecture |
Date: | 2025-06-18 17:12:30 |
Message-ID: | CAD5k+7wgFmO7V_ncFCHBOzO0d9H51O5aKDD+hcnrCbUgZomqiQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Team,
I am planning to implement a PostgreSQL High Availability (HA) and Load
Balancing setup and would greatly appreciate your feedback on the
architecture we've designed (see attached diagram).
[image: image.png]
*Overview of the Setup:*
-
Two PostgreSQL nodes (VM1 and VM2) configured with:
-
Asynchronous replication from the Primary DB (on VM1) to the Standby
DB (on VM2) using repmgr
-
HAProxy for failover management:
-
HAProxy 1 (active) on VM1
-
HAProxy 2 (passive) on VM2 with Keepalive for heartbeat and
failover detection
-
PgBouncer on both nodes for connection pooling
-
A Virtual IP (VIP) managed by HAProxy for routing traffic from the
application
-
Read/Write operations go to the Primary DB, and Read-Only queries can be
served from either node
*Objectives:*
-
Ensure high availability with automatic failover
-
Enable basic load balancing for read-only queries
-
Maintain connection pooling and routing efficiency
*Request for Feedback:*
-
Is this architecture considered a best practice within the PostgreSQL
community?
-
Are there any potential bottlenecks or failure points I should be aware
of?
-
Would you recommend any improvements or alternative tools for achieving
better reliability and performance?
Thanks
Vijay
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Al Grant | 2025-06-19 04:50:42 | Postgres DB design Question (High Level) |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-06-17 21:01:02 | Re: Changing locale of an existing database |