| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot |
| Date: | 2021-10-01 01:06:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoDhazkOJRT=J5JFg3UomcksuM=bb72SDEYOp64pFAw=Pw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 1:45 AM Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:14:23AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 5:29 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> > <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, I agree. Sorry for missing that.
> > >
> > > The updated patch looks good to me.
> > >
> >
> > Pushed!
> >
>
> This patch is still on "Needs review"!
> Should we change it to Committed or is expected something else
> about it?
Yes, the patch already gets committed (4c347885). So I also think we
should mark it as Committed.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-10-01 01:08:32 | Re: Addition of authenticated ID to pg_stat_activity |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-10-01 01:00:05 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |