Re: Two phase commit in ECPG

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Two phase commit in ECPG
Date: 2017-03-17 22:01:31
Message-ID: CAD21AoDPmy=uSVcY1=FXuG4KE_dBWAF-mYgQp5DsfnLAF88X7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> Thank you for pointing out.
>> Yeah, I agree that the twophase regression test should not be
>> performed by default as long as the default value of
>> max_prepared_transactions is 0. Similar to this, the isolation check
>> regression test does same thing. Attached patch removes sql/twophase
>> from schedule file and add new type of regression test.
>
> Would it be possible to include it in "make check"? Any check that
> needs manual interaction will not be executed nearly is often as the
> others and become much less useful imo.
>

Yes. I added two-phase commit test to "make check" test schedule while
adding new two type of test.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
ecpg_prepared_txns_test_v2.patch application/octet-stream 1.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message privat 2017-03-17 22:17:51 BUG #14593: Service doesn't start
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-03-17 20:04:45 Re: BUG #14512: Backslashes in LIKE

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-17 22:02:40 Re: [PATCH] Suppress Clang 3.9 warnings
Previous Message Pritam Baral 2017-03-17 21:41:28 Re: Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses