Re: pgsql: Allow autovacuum to use parallel vacuum workers.

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Allow autovacuum to use parallel vacuum workers.
Date: 2026-04-10 19:50:04
Message-ID: CAD21AoDMi8M6pxv5BQT2xVqAsTrKBdMP2jsY1QbTxRnpKz+KFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 3:35 AM Aleksander Alekseev
<aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Thank you for the report. Indeed, we need to fix the wording.
> >
> > I've attached the patch based on your proposal that uses the
> > explanation consistent with the manual VACUUM and autovacuums. What do
> > you think?
>
> Looks good.

Pushed.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2026-04-10 18:23:01 Re: pgsql: ssl: Serverside SNI support for libpq