From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
Date: | 2021-04-22 02:21:45 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoD76NFL9nSgLZ060kim9gK=+Xn9ou-iyP_uxkNZPKfM7g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:44 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:54 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've attached the patch. In addition to the test Vignesh prepared, I
> > added one test for the message for creating a slot that checks if the
> > statistics are initialized after re-creating the same name slot.
> > Please review it.
>
> Overall the patch looks good to me. However, I have one question, I
> did not understand the reason behind moving the below code from
> "pgstat_reset_replslot_counter" to "pg_stat_reset_replication_slot"?
Andres pointed out that pgstat_reset_replslot_counter() acquires lwlock[1]:
---
- pgstat_reset_replslot_counter() acquires ReplicationSlotControlLock. I
think pgstat.c has absolutely no business doing things on that level.
---
I changed the code so that pgstat_reset_replslot_counter() doesn't
acquire directly lwlock but I think that it's appropriate to do the
existence check for slots in pgstatfunc.c rather than pgstat.c.
Regards,
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw%40alap3.anarazel.de
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-04-22 02:55:33 | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-04-22 02:19:40 | Re: Stale description for pg_basebackup |