| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel vacuum: avoid dangling shared memory pointers |
| Date: | 2026-10-14 20:31:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoCs=u3dMvBf+6fwmqdVmmi_=TENrwUGc57OQTnd1XueAQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 8:31 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that two of the parallel vacuum's shared memory pointers
> (VacuumSharedCostBalance and VacuumActiveNWorkers) are not reset on
> the error path, leaving them dangling, that is, pointing to a shared
> memory segment that is already gone, until the next vacuum runs in the
> backend or autovacuum worker. This doesn't cause any issue today, but
> IMHO it is good practice to avoid dangling pointers.
>
> Please find the attached patch that sets them to NULL on the error
> path (the normal path resets them in
> parallel_vacuum_process_all_indexes()).
>
> Thoughts?
+1 to explicitly clear these variables.
Given that it doesn't cause any problems today, I think we can apply
it only to master.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-10-14 20:39:10 | Re: Wrong results from self-join elimination with inheritance and ONLY |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-10-14 19:38:57 | Re: [PG19] Stale state after the join removal restart gives wrong results |