Re: Update docs for UUID data type

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andy Alsup <bluesbreaker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Pgsql-Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update docs for UUID data type
Date: 2025-02-27 22:01:59
Message-ID: CAD21AoCqtuHyHoL_C_32Hcs77RoW6kqCJbvVNB2BL6OyrxfJOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 1:26 PM Andy Alsup <bluesbreaker(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I've submitted it for the up-coming commitfest. The link is: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5604/
> Thanks for all your help in reviewing these changes.

Thank you for the patch!

Regarding the 0001 patch, I think we can put uuidv4() and
get_random_uuid() in the same row since they are effectively identical
functions. For example, we have precedent such as char_length() and
character_length().

The 0002 patch looks good to me.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devulapalli, Raghuveer 2025-02-27 22:02:34 RE: Improve CRC32C performance on SSE4.2
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-02-27 21:50:00 Re: Should work_mem be stable for a prepared statement?