From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Duncan Sands <duncan(dot)sands(at)deepbluecap(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 |
Date: | 2025-05-28 18:51:39 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoCUJ=hvM=VDcH-Po=_spfyDwenniXEcgkiZU2xc4FJdJQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 4:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 2:52 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
> <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > If the above hypothesis is true, we need to consider another idea so
> > > that we can execute invalidation messages in both cases.
> >
> > The straightforward fix is to check the change queue as well when the transaction
> > has invalidation messages. 0003 implemented that. One downside is that traversing
> > changes can affect performance. Currently we iterates all of changes even a
> > single REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INVALIDATION. I cannot find better solutions for now.
> >
>
> It can impact the performance for large transactions with fewer
> invalidations, especially the ones which has spilled changes because
> it needs to traverse the entire list of changes again at the end.
What if we remember all executed REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INVALIDATION in
a queue while replaying the transaction so that we can execute them at
the end in a non-error path, instead of re-traversing the entire list
of changes to execute the inval messages? As for concurrent abort
paths, probably we can consider re-traversing the entire list,
unconditionally invalidating all caches (using
InvalidateSystemCaches()), or somehow traversing the list of changes
only when there might be any REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INVALIDATION in the
rest of changes?
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Hutchins | 2025-05-28 19:13:20 | Re: [E] Re: BUG #18938: Logical replication failure in 16.9: "invalid memory alloc request size 1372786672" |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-05-28 17:15:46 | Re: BUG #18938: Logical replication failure in 16.9: "invalid memory alloc request size 1372786672" |