| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why does logical replication launcher set application_name? |
| Date: | 2017-06-02 06:31:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoCU5TOLBv6cORtun0FeCSW3XVG_d+UbdHPK0NQ_LFP5Yw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is a proposed solution that splits bgw_name into bgw_type and
> bgw_name_extra. bgw_type shows up in pg_stat_activity.backend_type.
> Uses of application_name are removed, because they are no longer
> necessary to identity the process type.
Hmm, is there any reasons why bgw_name_extra string doesn't appear in
pg_stat_activity? I'd say current patch makes the user difficult to
distinguish between apply worker and table sync worker.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2017-06-02 06:32:16 | Re: [PATCH] Fixed malformed error message on malformed SCRAM message. |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2017-06-02 06:24:02 | Re: [PATCH] Fixed malformed error message on malformed SCRAM message. |