Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often
Date: 2023-04-25 13:31:11
Message-ID: CAD21AoCDhiH_OLkZWN6ZD38xFEoMzcnBmzpOKjG4StNht7oi+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:39 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
> > On 17 Apr 2023, at 04:04, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I've attached an updated patch for fixing at_dobalance condition.
>
> I revisited this and pushed it to all supported branches after another round of
> testing and reading.

Thanks!

Can we mark the open item "Can't disable autovacuum cost delay through
storage parameter" as resolved?

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-04-25 13:35:45 Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2023-04-25 13:06:05 RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node