From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add backup_type to pg_stat_progress_basebackup |
Date: | 2025-08-05 18:05:29 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoC8HKnCKmSQc6UCEHGPrya1Rb3PkeSA3+Orvvgmq31RaQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 1:57 AM Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 16:12:15 -0700
> Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > The patch seems reasonably simple and looks good to me. I've updated
> > the comment in bbsink_progress_new() and attached the modified version
> > patch (with the commit message). Please review it.
>
> /*
> - * Report that a base backup is in progress, and set the total size of the
> - * backup to -1, which will get translated to NULL. If we're estimating
> - * the backup size, we'll insert the real estimate when we have it.
> + * Report that a base backup is in progress, and set the backup type and
> + * the total size of the backup to -1, which will get translated to NULL,
> + * and backup. If we're estimating the backup size, we'll insert the real
> + * estimate when we have it.
> */
>
> It seems to me that "set the backup type and the total size of the backup to -1"
> is a bit confusing because it could be read that the backup type would be also set
> to -1, and the subsequent sentence describes just the total size.
>
> Therefore, I think it is better to just add "Also, the backup type is set."
> (or similar) to the end of the comment block.
>
> That said, I'm not a native English speaker, so if no one else sees a problem,
> I'm fine with it.
Agreed. I've changed the comment and pushed the patch.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-08-05 18:06:26 | Re: Datum as struct |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-08-05 17:40:22 | Re: Proposal: "query_work_mem" GUC, to distribute working memory to the query's individual operators |