Re: Block level parallel vacuum WIP

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block level parallel vacuum WIP
Date: 2017-10-05 01:50:19
Message-ID: CAD21AoC6LoFKKpnZnSoPcNiaB-OmufbehT4fV2wyCjAxVfhY1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Since v4 patch conflicts with current HEAD I attached the latest version patch.
>>
>> Hi Sawada-san,
>>
>> Here is an interesting failure with this patch:
>>
>> test rowsecurity ... FAILED
>> test rules ... FAILED
>>
>> Down at the bottom of the build log in the regression diffs file you can see:
>>
>> ! ERROR: cache lookup failed for relation 32893
>>
>> https://travis-ci.org/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/builds/277165907
>>
>
> Thank you for letting me know.
>
> Hmm, it's an interesting failure. I'll investigate it and post the new patch.
>

Since the patch conflicts with current HEAD, I've rebased the patch
and fixed a bug. Please review it.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
parallel_vacuum_v5.patch application/octet-stream 94.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-10-05 02:16:02 Re: document and use SPI_result_code_string()
Previous Message Wood, Dan 2017-10-05 01:39:52 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple