Re: Block level parallel vacuum WIP

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block level parallel vacuum WIP
Date: 2017-09-19 07:31:32
Message-ID: CAD21AoA57Y3cq_pQE6v4fwOhgq6FnVewt51FfDRt5pa_QYZV1g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Since v4 patch conflicts with current HEAD I attached the latest version patch.
>
> Hi Sawada-san,
>
> Here is an interesting failure with this patch:
>
> test rowsecurity ... FAILED
> test rules ... FAILED
>
> Down at the bottom of the build log in the regression diffs file you can see:
>
> ! ERROR: cache lookup failed for relation 32893
>
> https://travis-ci.org/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/builds/277165907
>

Thank you for letting me know.

Hmm, it's an interesting failure. I'll investigate it and post the new patch.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2017-09-19 07:34:48 Re: Pluggable storage
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-09-19 07:12:59 Re: Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal of superuser() checks