Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2023-06-27 08:20:03
Message-ID: CAD21AoBxV2qPoHuMMqPYasdw8VVz8EkJhZ_eC06hhfTBr_x0sA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 6:54 PM John Naylor
<john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> I wrote:
> > I cleaned up a few things and attached v34 so you can do that if you like.
>
> Of course, "clean" is a relative term. While making a small bit of progress working in tidbitmap.c earlier this week, I thought it useful to prototype some things in the tidstore, at which point I was reminded it no longer compiles because of my recent work. I put in the necessary incantations so that the v32 tidstore compiles and passes tests, so here's a patchset for that (but no vacuum changes). I thought it was a good time to also condense it down to look more similar to previous patches, as a basis for future work.
>

Thank you for updating the patch set. I'll look at updates closely
early next week.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2023-06-27 08:26:44 Re: Do we want a hashset type?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-06-27 08:10:25 Re: ReadRecentBuffer() doesn't scale well