From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |
Date: | 2023-06-27 08:20:03 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoBxV2qPoHuMMqPYasdw8VVz8EkJhZ_eC06hhfTBr_x0sA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 6:54 PM John Naylor
<john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> I wrote:
> > I cleaned up a few things and attached v34 so you can do that if you like.
>
> Of course, "clean" is a relative term. While making a small bit of progress working in tidbitmap.c earlier this week, I thought it useful to prototype some things in the tidstore, at which point I was reminded it no longer compiles because of my recent work. I put in the necessary incantations so that the v32 tidstore compiles and passes tests, so here's a patchset for that (but no vacuum changes). I thought it was a good time to also condense it down to look more similar to previous patches, as a basis for future work.
>
Thank you for updating the patch set. I'll look at updates closely
early next week.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Jacobson | 2023-06-27 08:26:44 | Re: Do we want a hashset type? |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-06-27 08:10:25 | Re: ReadRecentBuffer() doesn't scale well |