Re: 2021-07 CF now in progress

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2021-07 CF now in progress
Date: 2021-08-03 01:50:47
Message-ID: CAD21AoBmAK8TZPKOXtz5TqBbFe06XBfp9f9fbfyA9mZDHLq_8Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 10:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I can close this commitfest. But should we mark uncommitted patches as
> > "Moved to next CF" or "Returned with Feedback" beforehand?
>
> Should be moved to next CF, or at least most of them should be.
> (But I doubt anyone wants to try to kill off patches that
> aren't going anywhere right now.)

Agreed. I'll close this commitfest soon. The patches are automatically
marked as "Moved to next CF" by closing the commitfest?

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shinya11.Kato 2021-08-03 01:58:44 fix DECLARE tab completion
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-08-03 01:50:19 Re: Release 13 of the PostgreSQL BuildFarm client