Re: cutting down the TODO list thread

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cutting down the TODO list thread
Date: 2021-12-09 00:11:57
Message-ID: CAD21AoBdBs7AYPum20QvaNLPtETcvVzTQMUZG5y5CJO9TnBrfw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:40 AM John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> - Improve autovacuum tuning
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5078AD6B.8060802@agliodbs.com
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130124215715.GE4528@alvh.no-ip.org
>
> I'm kind of on the fence about these. The title is way too broad, and
> I doubt we are going to forget to keep improving this area.
>
> It seems the first thread is really about auto-analyze thresholds, so
> maybe it should be in a separate entry if we want to do anything
> mentioned in the thread?
>
> The second thread is really about autovacuum launcher scheduling.
> Probably still relevant, but the thread is very long and doesn't seem
> terribly helpful to someone trying to get up to speed on the issues
> that are still relevant. I don't see any more recent discussion,
> either. Thoughts?

There is another discussion on autovacuum scheduling in 2018 here:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8A4DC6%40G01JPEXMBYT05

Some algorithms were proposed there and I implemented a PoC patch:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoBUaSRBypA6pd9ZD%3DU-2TJCHtbyZRmrS91Nq0eVQ0B3BA%40mail.gmail.com

But not completed.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-12-09 00:12:10 Re: Fix typos - "an" instead of "a"
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-12-08 23:48:20 Re: parallel vacuum comments