Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "minsoo(at)amazon(dot)com" <minsoo(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
Date: 2022-08-12 00:08:59
Message-ID: CAD21AoBaTOOm3i-sOuvRQuikR-_X-Lq9imezj1zybxdcV94h8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 3:10 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 9:34 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 1:20 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Oops, thanks for pointing it out. I've fixed it and attached updated
> > > patches for all branches so as not to confuse the patch version. There
> > > is no update from v12 patch on REL12 - master patches.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the updated patches, the changes look good to me.
> > Horiguchi-San, and others, do you have any further comments on this or
> > do you want to spend time in review of it? If not, I would like to
> > push this after the current minor version release.
> >
>
> Pushed.

Thank you!

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2022-08-12 01:06:02 Re: test failure with gcc-12 -O3 -march=native
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2022-08-11 23:53:09 Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)