Re: Reject COPY TO of unlogged relations during recovery

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
Cc: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reject COPY TO of unlogged relations during recovery
Date: 2026-10-21 18:18:50
Message-ID: CAD21AoB3P8ub-0AuH=T-Vg9Zp_ac79tRv3nBksTQDN0H=EWDJQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 3:12 PM Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/20/26 10:52 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > These patches look good to me. Both patches should be backpatched to
> > v14. I'll push them, barring objections.
>
>
> Thanks!

I realized that currtid2() is an internal undocumented function so we
don't necessarily need to have the regression tests. So I've pushed
the patches after removing the regression test.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-10-21 18:28:03 Re: [DEPARSE] Operators on ROW() constructors read back as row comparisons
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2026-10-21 18:15:00 Re: Introduce XID age based replication slot invalidation