Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 9:59 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 8:31 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>>
>> > On 26 Apr 2023, at 13:26, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 26 Apr 2023, 8:48 pm Masahiko Sawada, <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>> > It works but I think we might want to add the unit kB for
>> > understandability and consistency with other GUC_UNIT_KB parameters.
>> > I've attached a small patch that adds the unit and aligns the indent
>> > of the comments to the perimeter parameters.
>> >
>> > I'm not currently able to check, but if work_mem has a unit in the sample conf then I agree that vacuum_buffer_usage_limit should too.
>>
>> +1 work_mem and all other related options in this section has a unit in the
>> sample conf so adding this makes sense.
>
>
> Agreed.
> for the patch, the other GUCs have a tab instead of a space between the unit and the "#" of the first comment.
> (not the fault of this patch but probably makes sense to fix now).
> Otherwise, LGTM

Thanks for the review! Pushed after incorporating a comment from Melanie.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com