Re: Per-table resync for logical replication subscriptions

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Cagri Biroglu <cagri(dot)biroglu(at)adyen(dot)com>
Cc: "smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com" <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Per-table resync for logical replication subscriptions
Date: 2026-08-07 23:48:26
Message-ID: CAD21AoAoq2J9nOzM29W6+-Oyr1c_xFg60NeqLyN5sxGvx9JM7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 12:00 AM Cagri Biroglu <cagri(dot)biroglu(at)adyen(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I wanted to follow up on this patch, as there has not been any activity on the thread for some time.
>
> The proposal is still relevant from my side, and I am happy to rebase the patch, run additional tests, or address any design concerns or review feedback.
>

Thank you for submitting the patch!

I'll review the patch and share my comments. Meanwhile, please
register this patch to the next CommitFest[1] if not yet.

Regards,

[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/61/

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-08-08 00:00:56 Re: Fix detection of truncated zstd-compressed backups
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2026-08-07 22:45:11 Re: Remove unused vacuum-truncate-auto injection point