| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
| Date: | 2023-02-24 06:16:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoAmJjfxe8HMd-zVtcaWzvYN=e8s=YPWg9nPBQb-ite2mw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 1:48 AM Imseih (AWS), Sami <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> > I think PROGRESS_VACUUM_INDEXES_TOTAL and
> > PROGRESS_VACUUM_INDEXES_PROCESSED are better for consistency. The rest
> > looks good to me.
>
> Took care of that in v25.
Thanks! It looks good to me so I've marked it as Ready for Committer.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2023-02-24 07:11:38 | Re: Proposal: :SQL_EXEC_TIME (like :ROW_COUNT) Variable (psql) |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2023-02-24 06:08:38 | Doc updates for MERGE |