Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>>> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Jim Nasby wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think things like pageinspect are very different; I really can't see any
>>>>> use for those beyond debugging (and debugging by an expert at that).
>>>>
>>>> I don't think that necessarily means it must continue to be in contrib.
>>>> Quite the contrary, I think it is a tool critical enough that it should
>>>> not be relegated to be a second-class citizen as it is now (let's face
>>>> it, being in contrib *is* second-class citizenship).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Attached patch is latest patch.
>>
>> The previous patch lacks some files for regression test.
>> Attached fixed v12 patch.
>
> The patch could be applied cleanly. "make check" could pass successfully.
> But "make check-world -j 2" failed.
>

Thank you for looking at this patch.
Could you tell me what test you got failed?
make check-world -j 2 or more is done successfully in my environment.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada