Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani(at)google(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Date: 2024-12-10 21:50:16
Message-ID: CAD21AoAeOSj2X_0zJ-trkYu+q6VR60EjOFJSBe6G2pGUyQPebQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 10:27 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 03:21:38PM +0530, Shlok Kyal wrote:
> > I have tested the scenario shared by you on the thread [1]. And I
> > confirm that the latest patch [2] fixes this issue.
> >
> > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoAenVqiMjpN-PvGHL1N9DWnHSq673bfgr6phmBUzx=kLQ@mail.gmail.com
> > [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANhcyEWfqdUvn2d2KOdvkhebBi5VO6O8J%2BC6%2BOwsPNwCTM%3DakQ%40mail.gmail.com
>
> Sawada-san, are you planning to look at that? It looks like this
> thread is waiting for your input.

Sorry I lost track of this thread. I'll check the test results and patch soon.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-12-10 21:52:19 Re: Unmark gen_random_uuid() function leakproof
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-12-10 21:48:21 Re: Skip collecting decoded changes of already-aborted transactions