From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com> |
Cc: | michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |
Date: | 2025-09-15 17:00:18 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoADXWgdizS0mV5w8wdfftDRsm8sUtNW=CzYYS1OhjFD2A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 5:07 PM Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In <CAD21AoCfqD=f2ELqPxg62+_QADhHi_kJXCDMhAerBtvxudd-xQ(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> "Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations" on Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:41:26 -0700,
> Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I think we can use a local variable of CopyFormatOptions and memcpy it
> > to the opts of the returned cstate.
>
> It'll work too. Can we proceed this proposal with this
> approach? Should we collect more opinions before we proceed?
> If so, Could you add key people in this area to Cc to hear
> their opinions?
Since we don't have a single decision-maker, we should proceed through
consensus-building and careful evaluation of each approach. I see that
several senior hackers are already included in this thread, which is
excellent. Since you and I, who have been involved in these
discussions, agreed with this approach, I believe we can proceed with
this direction. If anyone proposes alternative solutions that we find
more compelling, we might have to change the approach.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | DIPESH DHAMELIYA | 2025-09-15 17:13:06 | Clarification on DROP OWNED BY command in PG18 |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2025-09-15 16:55:44 | Re: proposal: schema variables |