Re: pg_waldump/heapdesc.c and struct field names

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_waldump/heapdesc.c and struct field names
Date: 2021-01-04 04:57:36
Message-ID: CAD21AoA6FuaioSmq3FQ2rX3qCqhC8Y1RA__VC6nOO9krPKUsNQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 12:55 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> I notice that heapdesc.c outputs the field latestRemovedXid as
> "remxid". But why? What sense is there in changing the name for output
> by tools like pg_waldump, which are intrinsically internals focussed?

Not sure but it has been "remxid" from the beginning. See efc16ea5206.

> Does anyone have any objections to my changing the details within
> heapdesc.c on master, so that pg_waldump will use struct field names?
> It doesn't seem necessary to change the output that has spaces instead
> of an underscore, or something like that. It just seems worth removing
> gratuitous inconsistencies, such as this one.

+1 for changing heapdesc.c on master. It's not only readable but also
consistent with other *desc showing the field named latestRemovedXid.
For instance, nbtdesc.c has:

case XLOG_BTREE_REUSE_PAGE:
{
xl_btree_reuse_page *xlrec = (xl_btree_reuse_page *) rec;

appendStringInfo(buf, "rel %u/%u/%u; latestRemovedXid %u",
xlrec->node.spcNode, xlrec->node.dbNode,
xlrec->node.relNode, xlrec->latestRemovedXid);
break;
}

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-01-04 05:05:23 Re: faster ETL / bulk data load for heap tables
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-01-04 03:54:38 pg_waldump/heapdesc.c and struct field names