Re: Add psql tab completion support for FOR PORTION OF

From: Kiran Kaki <itskkpg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add psql tab completion support for FOR PORTION OF
Date: 2026-05-15 05:08:13
Message-ID: CAD0dvCQkLSNsL9+TDE=LeRhn=uztbt9NVuTsZ6OOweFVV9rQOg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

@Peter,

Thanks so much for fixing and pushing that, really appreciate it! Your
feedback sparked a few more scenarios I want to explore. Planning to get
those changes out early next week.

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 8:30 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
wrote:

> On 27.04.26 11:02, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 15.04.26 05:52, Kiran K wrote:
> >> Add tab completion support in psql for the FOR PORTION OF clause
> >> used in UPDATE and DELETE statements with temporal tables.
> >> Attached a patch with the changes and corresponding tests.
> >
> > This looks very useful, but it seems one of the rules doesn't quite work
> > in my testing:
> >
> > update pg_class for portion of oid from 1 to 2 <tab>
> >
> > I think you mean for this to complete AS or SET, but it offers nothing
> > in my testing. (Same with DELETE.)
>
> In order to semi-conclude this thread, I have committed this patch with
> the rule that didn't work removed. Thanks.
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexandra Wang 2026-05-15 05:08:56 Re: Is there value in having optimizer stats for joins/foreignkeys?
Previous Message Yugo Nagata 2026-05-15 05:03:02 Re: Track skipped tables during autovacuum and autoanalyze