From: | Bruno Lavoie <bl(at)brunol(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Failed rpm package signature checks with reposync |
Date: | 2018-06-19 16:27:51 |
Message-ID: | CAD+GXYPeRwdUn-4Q1vm+cwSGmaqEV50aa4djWugtqdtspyyjtA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi Devrim,
It works now.
Thanks
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 08:31 -0400, Bruno Lavoie wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, me too just saw your email...
> >
> > Issue still persists:
> >
> > # reposync --repoid=pgdg10 --gpgcheck
> > --download_path=/var/www/html/centos7/repos/postgresql/
> > Repository 'base' is missing name in configuration, using id
> > Removing mysql_fdw_10-2.3.0-3.rhel7.x86_64.rpm due to failed signature
> > check.
> > Removing mysql_fdw_10-debuginfo-2.3.0-3.rhel7.x86_64.rpm due to failed
> > signature check.
> > Removing osm2pgrouting_10-2.3.3-1.rhel7.x86_64.rpm due to failed
> signature
> > check.
> > Removing osm2pgrouting_10-debuginfo-2.3.3-1.rhel7.x86_64.rpm due to
> failed
> > signature check.
>
> Ok, verified on my end as well. Fixed this, and pushed them to the repo.
> They
> will be available 1 hour later. Can you please try again then?
>
> Regards,
> --
> Devrim Gündüz
> EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
> PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
> Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Juan Manuel Cuello | 2018-06-19 16:47:24 | Re: High WriteLatency RDS Postgres 9.3.20 |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-06-19 15:53:29 | Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-06-19 16:33:17 | Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-06-19 16:17:59 | Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade |